Editor’s note: This article is from Iowa Capitol Dispatch from Nov. 17, 2022.

Judging from the furrowed brows and dire predictions in Iowa, you might have thought a national Democratic Party committee had voted to eliminate motherhood and apple pie last week.

Actually, what the committee voted to eliminate were Iowa’s first-in-the-nation Democratic precinct caucuses — a quirky, though coveted, kick-off role for Iowa Democrats in the party’s presidential nomination process every four years since 1972.

After the fiasco in the 2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses, when tabulating and reporting glitches left the outcome in doubt for several weeks, the decision on Friday was as much of a surprise as Gov. Kim Reynolds’ landslide reelection victory.

The critics would have you believe the national Democratic Party is not interested in rural America in general, nor Iowa specifically. The critics included some unlikely allies.

Scott Brennan, a Des Moines lawyer and member of the Democrats’ rules and bylaws committee that met Friday, said the decision was a “kick in the teeth” to Iowa. U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, a Republican, said the decision showed “complete disregard for Iowa voters + rural America.”

Grassley and Brennan both favor Iowa Democrats ignoring the national committee’s choice, and President Joe Biden’s preference, to have South Carolina host the first presidential primary in 2024.

Grassley issued a lengthy statement last week in which he claimed “coastal elites and party bosses put their thumb on the electoral scale to drown out the voices and values of Middle America to advance their woke agenda.”

The senator let his adjectives get out of hand. As with many things in life, everyone wants to be first. But that is impossible. Everyone cannot go first.

For half a century, Iowa has enjoyed its time in the national presidential spotlight every four years. But as that spotlight has grown brighter, Democrats in other states have objected to the disproportionate share of attention Iowa always gets from candidates running for president.

If you poured truth serum down the throats of Iowa Democratic leaders, they would admit the caucuses are a quirky process that is more time consuming for participants than simply voting in a primary election. That flaw with the caucus structure undermines the near mythological status accorded to Iowa.

Those who work on caucus night are left out and could not be counted. So were people who could not set aside two or three hours to stand shoulder to shoulder in a school lunchroom or a church meeting room. Those who were out of town could not participate, either, because there was no absentee ballot option.

And then there were the problems for interested Democrats who could not drive at night, or who were fearful of venturing out in nasty winter weather, or who were in poor health.

There are some painful facts that Brennan and other Iowa Democratic leaders should agree on, chief among them that the most important task for the party should be recruiting, training, equipping and supporting strong Democrats to run for local and state offices.

The outcome of Iowa elections in recent years underscores that uncomfortable fact of life for Democrats.

A Democrat last occupied the governor’s office in 2010. That also was the last time the party held majorities in both the Iowa House and Iowa Senate. And Democrats last had a majority in one legislative chamber, the Senate, in 2016.

Iowa Democratic leaders should not allow their attention to be diverted by a no-win fight over which state gets to go first in 2024 in helping to choose the Democratic nominee for president.

It would be wise for Brennan and Iowa Democratic Party chair Ross Wilburn of Ames to put aside their personal disappointment and consider whether a chaotic fight across the United States over the Democrats’ nominating calendar is a recipe for party discord and division heading into the 2024 presidential election.

Frankly, it is silly for anyone to assert that Iowa is the only place for candidates to go to discern Democrats’ presidential preferences or to divine the thinking of people in Middle America. It is nonsense to believe that campaigning in another state is too expensive or that candidates schmoozing in coffee shops and cafés cannot occur anywhere else.

South Carolina is about half the size of Iowa, but its population is 50% larger than Iowa’s. And Black people make up a significantly larger share of South Carolina’s population, although the number of white residents living there is larger than Iowa’s total population.

There is one wrinkle that complicates all of this. An Iowa law requires the state’s Republican and Democratic caucuses to be held first, before any other state’s presidential nominating event.

There is no way the Iowa Legislature, with both chambers in firm control of Republicans, is going to let the Iowa Democratic Party off the hook. And some top Democrats in Iowa — and Republican Grassley, too — want to see the Iowa party ignore the national party’s decision and hold Iowa’s Democratic caucuses ahead of any other state.

But Brennan and Wilburn should avoid the temptation. Doing so would lead to chaos and acrimony among Democrats nationally — which is just what Grassley and other top Iowa Republicans hope to see.